The bart covid vaccine lawsuit draw a lot of attention and interest from the public simply because the lawsuit and the events leading to it mirrored what was happening or happened across the globe. BART which stands for Bay Area Transit district faced a serious lawsuit regarding its conduct during the Covid period. In the lawsuit, BART was accused of firing six of its employees for refusing get a Covid vaccine.
The employees whose names have been withheld due to privacy reasons refused to take the covid vaccine despite attempts by their company to get them doing so. This they claimed to have done purely out of religious reasons and nothing else. However, the company did not see it that way and instead saw it as a form of mutiny for which they punished the employees by sacking them.
These six employees upon getting fired on the grounds of refusing to take a covid vaccine decided to go to court to seek redress on their case. They felt that they were treated unfairly and discriminated and wanted the court to hear them out and compel their former employer to compensate them.
The Judge in Court Sided with The Six Employees in The BART Lawsuit
In the bart covid vaccine lawsuit, the six employees argued strongly that their company failed to give adequate consideration to their religious orientation. In the lawsuit, they claimed that their company should have given them exemption from the vaccination process but failed to do so hence discriminating them or failing to give adequate weight to their religious beliefs.
The court heard this lawsuit whole and sided with the six employees. In its ruling, the court claimed that the company had acted wrongly by denying the six employees’ exemption from covid vaccination based on their religious beliefs. For this, the federal jury sided with the employees by finding their employer guilty of failing to consider their religious beliefs.
For this offence, the jury in its ruling awarded the employees $7.8 million dollars in damages occurring from this lawsuit. The award of $7.8 million was the last update on the bart covid vaccine lawsuit. It is not clear if the punished company will go ahead to appeal the case or if they will pay the money, they are requested to pay without much of a fuss.
The affected employees are also yet to make a comment on the matter as the whole issue is still inconclusive at this point. The biggest takeaway from the lawsuit is that companies can sometimes be very insensitive to the welfare of their employees. This is shown and demonstrated in the manner in which the said company handled the request by some of their employees to not be vaccinated due to religious reasons. There have been such cases in the past and many more are likely to follow in the coming days.
Conclusion
The bart covid vaccine lawsuit shed more light on what sometimes goes on in companies. This case is a great revelation of cases of employee discrimination and how that can come back to bite the affected companies hard.